|
|
 Originally Posted by BananaStand
Not quite the worst rule in the game, but I see what you're saying.
But the reason that OT is exciting is at least partly because it's not 5 on 5 like regulation play. Fewer players means more open ice, which creates a faster, more fluid gameplay that heavily favors the offense, and is loads more fun to watch.
If you ask me, the worst rule in the game is the limitations on rink size. In the Olympics, and I think other international leagues, the rink is bigger. And again, more open ice, means more offense, means more scoring.
But we're getting off topic, my only point with this analogy is that it's possible for someone to be within the rules, but still undermining the spirit, purpose, and intent of the game. That's what Dems were doing by boycotting these hearings. The NHL dealt with it the same way repubs did. Change the rules, and force the players to play.
Sorry, thought this was hockey thread. Or at least it should be.
More ice would be ok but not a decisive change imo. There's only so much you can do on the boards and behind the net, though I agree it would help the game a bit. I wouldn't mind seeing 4 on 4 in regulation as standard. Give the skill players room to manouevre.
|
Reply With Quote