**** Elections thread *****

[OngBonga]

So investigate. Who made these machines? Are they hackable? Is it a case of small sample size skewing results?

I'm fine with taking them out of service, but not fine with assuming it's a Republican attempt to fiddle elections, less so if you're immediately pointing to the top.

[CoccoBill]

Are they hackable?

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/26/m...-midterms.html
https://www.usenix.org/legacy/event/...tml/index.html

[OngBonga]

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/26/m...-midterms.html
https://www.usenix.org/legacy/event/...tml/index.html

I'm going to take this as a yes, they are hackable. If that's the case, then how can anyone know the agenda of those doing the hacking? Have they been identified? And if so, by whom?

[Jack Sawyer]

I'm going to take this as a yes, they are hackable. If that's the case, then how can anyone know the agenda of those doing the hacking? Have they been identified? And if so, by whom?

Does the end result not *kind of* show the agenda?

[OngBonga]

Does the end result not *kind of* show the agenda?

Of course not. Have you ever heard of the term "false flag"?

[Jack Sawyer]

Of course not. Have you ever heard of the term "false flag"?

How many examples have there to be for you to stop crying "false flag" on all of them? I mean, one has to be true at the very least. Or are they all just, particularly, Dem lies as the Rs are incapable of any wrong? And not the same wrongs over and over?

Are the Dems that good at contraespionage or whatever?

[Jack Sawyer]

How many examples have there to be for you to stop crying "false flag" on all of them? I mean, one has to be true at the very least. Or are they all just, particularly, Dem lies as the Rs are incapable of any wrong? And not the same wrongs over and over?

Are the Dems that good at contraespionage or whatever?

I'm half asleep right now, I mean more like

Let's take the magabomber as an example. I seem to remember you said it's all staged. Do you really believe that the dems were in for the long con? As this dude has been spotted ages before with his same decals in place

Same decals you said looked too pristine to be true

Anyway, I'll continue sleeping now, gn

[Poopadoop]

So investigate. Who made these machines? Are they hackable? Is it a case of small sample size skewing results?

I'm fine with taking them out of service, but not fine with assuming it's a Republican attempt to fiddle elections, less so if you're immediately pointing to the top.

Why would anyone suspect it was an R attempt to fiddle? Oh yeah, because it is working in the R direction 99/100 times.

For a tinfoil hat guy who questions everything when there's no evidence it's funny how you don't find this suspicious at all, when the evidence is smacking you in the face.

[OngBonga]

For a tinfoil hat guy who questions everything when there's no evidence it's funny how you don't find this suspicious at all, when the evidence is smacking you in the face.

There's no evidence smacking me in the face. If I were going to going down the path of suspicion, I'd be more inclined to think the Dems are doing it in order to make the Reps look like cheats. I mean, how can you know that isn't the case? Have you analysed all the evidence and thus have the luxury of ruling out such a theory?

[Poopadoop]

There's no evidence smacking me in the face. If I were going to going down the path of suspicion, I'd be more inclined to think the Dems are doing it in order to make the Reps look like cheats. I mean, how can you know that isn't the case? Have you analysed all the evidence and thus have the luxury of ruling out such a theory?

So prima facie, the election machines are hacked in close elections to give the R candidate an edge, and your first thought is the D's are doing it to make the R's look bad.

I suppose the D's are also the ones using voter suppression against black voters. In fact, the D's are probably trying to rig all the elections so they'll lose and then not have any power, just as long as they can accuse their opponents of cheating.

In fact, the whole point of the D party is not to try to govern but to try to frame the R party as cheats.

The D's probably planted the evidence about 9/11 being a hoax just to discredit the R's too.

I think the D's probably also did Watergate and then found a way to blame it on Nixon.

Fuck that Soros is an evil genius.

Brilliant.

[OngBonga]

All this because I don't trust the media. It's like I'm committing a fucking hate crime.

[Jack Sawyer]

All this because I don't trust the media. It's like I'm committing a fucking hate crime.

One thing is not trusting the media, another is malinterpreting facts constantly.

[OngBonga]

I suppose the D's are also the ones using voter suppression against black voters

Voter suppression? Is that where they exploit the poor by making victims out of them? Because yes, they totally do that.

[Jack Sawyer]

There's no evidence smacking me in the face. If I were going to going down the path of suspicion, I'd be more inclined to think the Dems are doing it in order to make the Reps look like cheats. I mean, how can you know that isn't the case? Have you analysed all the evidence and thus have the luxury of ruling out such a theory?

LOL, the dems are doing an awful lot lately to make the Rs look bad. Like the bodybuilder magabomber.