|
 Originally Posted by MadMojoMonkey
The notion that every gun is designed with the primary intention to kill is unimaginative. But it's a silly point to make on my part.
It seems to me the holder's intent is the dangerous part, no matter the object or its manufacturer's intent.
Sad truth:
If every gun on the planet were eliminated, people would go back to crossbows and any other implementation of delivering a rock at range.
All guns that fire live ammo are designed with the primary intention of killing. They were originally developed to fight wars and kill with as much efficiency as possible constantly becoming more accurate and reliable.
They fire a bullet accurately towards whatever you aim at, at 1000ft a sec or more, tell me what else is this useful for?
Also agree with daviddem people will react differently to certain situations depending on whether they have a gun or not.
What do you think poses a greater threat to human life, crossbows and catapults, or semi-automatic handguns and fully automatic weapons?
Guns are designed to kill that's indisputable.
|