|
 Originally Posted by bigred
No no no. Not at all.
Yes yes yes, very much
 Originally Posted by bigred
You unmask for context. It is that simple.
No you don't. Intelligence agencies are supposed to be OBSESSIVE and have extraordinarily high standards for unmasking US citizens. That was Comey's testimony a few weeks ago. You don't do it casually, for context.
 Originally Posted by bigred
It is not a stretch. Your FYP is also garbage.
Yeah, it kinda is a stretch. This surveillance is supposed to be targeting foreign operatives, not american citizens. It's not really necessary to know exactly who those foreign operatives are talking to, that's why there is such a thing as 'masking' in the first place.
It's kind of a stretch to think that the unmasking of names, the simultaneous changing of regulations to allow information to be disseminated across 17 intelligence agencies, AND the leaking are all not connected. If you think that's all just 'normal' and 'coincidental', I'd say you're being naive.
 Originally Posted by bigred
How did Susan Rice unmask to undermine Trump? I haven't seen that connection made.
How did the Russian government collude with the Trump campaign? I haven't seen that connection made either.
 Originally Posted by bigred
All I see is finger-pointing at the unmasking process,
All I see is conspiracy theorists trying to re-litigate what they feel are unfavorable election results.
 Originally Posted by bigred
which I will emphasize, once again, is not illegal.
It's an abuse of power, which is also not illegal, but still very very very bad.
 Originally Posted by bigred
You lost me at O'Reilly. Find a respectable source.
Oh go fuck yourself with this garbage. Was OJ a good running back? Was Tiger Woods good at golf? Are Ferguson and Lederer good poker players?
 Originally Posted by bigred
What a garbage human being who when he's not busy inciting propaganda is busy taking advantage of young women with his position.
How is that relevant? If he harassed some women, how does that impugn his political acumen or ability to cultivate robust debate on television?
What's your point? Only saints can have opinions?
|