|
Dont read this. Maybe just lock the thread. I'm not going to convince anyone, no one is going to convince me. It is not in my nature to fold.
 Originally Posted by RiverMonkey
o shake up the Middle East geo-politically
kicking an anthill is retarded. maybe you only get a few bites this time, but it's still retarded.
 Originally Posted by RiverMonkey
o send a very loud and clear message to Iran, N. Korea, Libya, Syria, etc.
the taliban lasted about four days. that seemed pretty loud and clear. Remember folks in Beruit waving american flags in sympathy on september 12, 2001? Nobody was interested in harboring terrorists. Really.
 Originally Posted by RiverMonkey
o Afghanistan ended too quickly and the REAL war on terror isn't visible enough
I'm not sure what you mean by "ended". most of us special forces seem to still be deployed in Afghanistan. As far as the REAL war on terror goes, pakistan keeps offering to allow more troops and the cia into the north, but the us keeps declining.
 Originally Posted by RiverMonkey
o the small possibility of finding WMDs (turned out to be a public relations ploy gone bad),
let's say this is about 3% of the total reason for war... 45 us troops died for PR. sounds retarded.
 Originally Posted by RiverMonkey
o get rid of a few terrorists or terrorist camps (mostly for a feather in the cap reasons, and to be able to tell the public that they are making progress in the "War on Terror"),
see above.
 Originally Posted by RiverMonkey
o getting rid of Saddam, and his crackpot sons
There always were, and always will be crackpot dictators. who cares? they were a stable government, willing to play ball with us policies. what more do we require?
 Originally Posted by RiverMonkey
o getting rid of the burden and risk of policing the no-fly-zones (that jet fuel can get expensive)
That occupation can cost a whole lot more.
 Originally Posted by RiverMonkey
o prove the UN's oil for food program was not working (turned out to be much worse than that)
Investegators are cheap. Oil for food was all public record, nobody went to look what was going on until well after the fact. It's good that the corruption was discovered, but with that sort of thing, it's only a matter of time, the greedy get more greedy, and screw up.
 Originally Posted by RiverMonkey
o Bush really believes in Manifest Destiny. He genuinely believes that the US has an obligation to spread freedom. Now, I'd love to ask him how he chooses where to do and not do this!!! I really don't think this idea its just 100% window-dressing.
Manifest Destiny is the idea that the US is destined to spread to the pacific. Thus it was ok to conquer mexico and the indians. If President Bush was annexing Iraq as a territory of the US i'd be a lot more enthusiastic about blowing cash there. But that's not his mission. he claims to want to set up an Iraqi democracy, and leave them in peace.
I think it's kicking an anthill. I think it's the united states' job to lead by example. to be the shining city on a hill, as an inspiration for the rest of the world. Let people immigrate and work hard. We can deal with forign nations on whatever terms we wish, but meddling in their internal affairs is foolish. Controling thier internal affairs by force is folly.
I'm just some guy y'know. he's rich, he went to an ivy league school. He's charming, and clever. I just don't think he's right. My risk of being killed by a terrorist is much less than winning the lottery. Sure, there are terrorists, and i'm sure their evil, i'm willing to allow lots of my money to be spent on catching them. The other nonsense with the "axis of evil" sounds silly to me though.
|