Jon Stewart Completely Pwns Republican Hypocrites

[metaxy6]

I don't know if I'm allowed to post this at the new FTR, since Gabe won't like it, but oh well, in case you haven't seen it yet:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W1lCMH8rlHE

[zook]

looool

[Jack Sawyer]

LOL good stuff

[UG]

FOX NEWS IS FAIR AND BALANCED IMO




hilarious stuff

[Jack Sawyer]

FOX NEWS IS FAIR AND BALANCED IMO




hilarious stuff

yup

these are all probably out of context soundbites

[swiggidy]

Amazing. Stewart's at his best during election years, IMO.

[UG]

FOX NEWS IS FAIR AND BALANCED IMO




hilarious stuff

yup

these are all probably out of context soundbites

I hope I'm reading you wrong and you really do have your sarcasm/bullshit detector on when I yell FOX NEWS IS FAIR AND BALANCED IMO

[Jack Sawyer]

LOL UG


don't forget this is my thread
http://www.flopturnriver.com/phpBB2/...ght=fox%20rant


do YOU have your sarcasm/bullshit detector on?


also, O/U on the first real defensive reply in this thread?

[gabe]

because of what was mentioned im not even gonna watch it

[a500lbgorilla]

haha check it out gabe!

[bode]

stay strong gabe

[bigred]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rw1vEzqld0I

Could the republicans show a little class and stop raping 9/11 for their own benefit. It's pathetic.

[givememyleg]

This video is no longer available due to a copyright claim by Viacom International Inc.

where else can i watch this video?

[givememyleg]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nbEePFpB8ww pretty sure this is it?

[Jack Sawyer]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nbEePFpB8ww pretty sure this is it?

yup, this is it

literally & figuratively

[Hawk]

this one is gone now too

they do have daily show on thedailyshow.com

someone find the video there plz. i want to see

[zook]

http://www.thedailyshow.com/full-epi...isodeId=184082

Starts at 9 min.

[mrhappy333]

This video is no longer available due to a copyright claim by Viacom International Inc.

[zook]

[Hawk]

haha

good stuff

ty finders.

[will641]

the one with karl rove is taken out of context because he was talking about kaine wouldnt be good on obama's ticket because of lack of experience, because of how unexperienced obama is, whereas mccain has been in the senate 25-30 years or w/e so its not as big a deal. the one with dick morris' being sexist is a poor analogy imo. also the one with jamie lynn spears on o'reilly has some legitimacy, but surely you can see why its different. the spears family is pretty disfunctional. also, he has been just as compassionate to dem's families when something like a sex scandal (spitzer/edwards) is made public.

for the record though i still thought it was funny.

[Jack Sawyer]

BOOM! thats 20

I had it on under 15.5

shit

[UG]

FU PAY ME

[Jack Sawyer]

stars/ FT nick?

[UG]

geowal21 stars lol



btw, gabe, if you're still reading this thread you need to click on the link and watch the video......at least for the comedic value of it all.

[Jack Sawyer]

Hello Avi_Tristan,


We have transferred $0.02 from your account to 'geowal21' as per your request.

Good luck to you both.


Regards,

PokerStars Cashier

[UG]

SHIP IT






p.s. if I can do this 99 more times I will have a full buy-in and be able to play poker again!

[Hawk]

lol jack and UG too

[jdubs]

I Love it, thank you.

http://www.thedailyshow.com/full-epi...isodeId=184082

[Numbr2intheWorld]

This is hilarious.

However this whole thread is ruined by people who think fox news is any worse than any other news source. The whole media is so liberal its sooooooooooooo dumb

[UG]

This is hilarious.

However this whole thread is ruined by people who think fox news is any worse than any other news source. The whole media is so liberal its sooooooooooooo dumb

that's exactly why fox news is so hilarious because it's batshit insane off the wall against what the rest of the FAIR AND BALANCED media is reporting

[AFchung]

This video is no longer available due to a copyright claim by Viacom International Inc.

[CoccoBill]

For me Daily Show's and Colbert's popularity restore some hope in the mankind.

[pgil]

However this whole thread is ruined by people who think fox news is any worse than any other news source. The whole media is so liberal its sooooooooooooo dumb

I wish people would stop spouting this stuff like it's actually true. Just because everybody says it, doesn't make it so. watch some cnn for a while and come back with just how liberal it is.

[will641]

BOOM! thats 20

I had it on under 15.5

shit

lol you guys had a bet as to how many posts it would take for me to defend fox news? i find that really funny because in the past few months i have avoided political threads, particularly media bias threads. you know, god forbid somebody has a different pov than you. people that bitch about fox news are basically people that want to try to make everyone think like they do. we have one conservative news station on air, and you have the nerve to bitch about it to no end. just amazing. im very curious though, if fox is so biased and horribal and bad and eval, why does it dominate the ratings? surely not for just "entertainment" value.

[Numbr2intheWorld]

Did anyone see that hot lawyer chick on fox news the other day? She was going off about sexism with Palin and all i could do was stare at her tits.

[will641]

Did anyone see that hot lawyer chick on fox news the other day? She was going off about sexism with Palin and all i could do was stare at her tits.

which one? megyn kelly is hawt imo.

[jdubs]

Fox is so blatantly biased it's so obvious, how can anyone not see this???

[CoccoBill]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Outfoxed

Recommended.

[Jack Sawyer]

This video is no longer available due to a copyright claim by Viacom International Inc.

http://www.thedailyshow.com/full-epi...isodeId=184082

apparently, 9 minutes in

[boost]

http://www.thedailyshow.com/full-episodes/index.jhtml?episodeId=184082

Starts at 9 min.

18:54, "settle down"

LOLOWNED

[metaxy6]

the one with karl rove is taken out of context because he was talking about kaine wouldnt be good on obama's ticket because of lack of experience, because of how unexperienced obama is, whereas mccain has been in the senate 25-30 years or w/e so its not as big a deal. the one with dick morris' being sexist is a poor analogy imo. also the one with jamie lynn spears on o'reilly has some legitimacy, but surely you can see why its different. the spears family is pretty disfunctional. also, he has been just as compassionate to dem's families when something like a sex scandal (spitzer/edwards) is made public.

This is just silly.

[Jack Sawyer]

http://www.crooksandliars.com/media/play/qt/6564/23300

[wufwugy]

However this whole thread is ruined by people who think fox news is any worse than any other news source. The whole media is so liberal its sooooooooooooo dumb

I wish people would stop spouting this stuff like it's actually true. Just because everybody says it, doesn't make it so. watch some cnn for a while and come back with just how liberal it is.

yep

anything can be thought of as biased. are biologists biased for evolution or are they making the most correct decision based on all the evidence, are missles biased towards speed accuracy penetration and explosion or are they required to have those attributes in order to be successful?

it could simply just be that the most correct political policies are found on the liberal side, yet that does not mean that the media that espouses those policies is biased.

besides, media is mostly wrong anyways. the more i learn about govt's roll in politics throughout history the more i learn that they most often were able to keep the truth out of the populous, and thus the popular debate was about the wrong stuff.

fwiw, i am not liberal. i am merely new to liberal politics, and i am 100% against neo-republicans because they achieve the opposite of that which they say they will. for example, fiscal conservativism. yea, how many people are republicans because they want fiscal responsibility, and how much worse at fiscal responsibility are republicans than democrats?

also, the parties' policies have changed a bunch over the years. for example, repubs like to point out that lincoln was a repub. well yea he was but at that time repubs were the liberal party.

[sarbox68]

fwiw, i am not liberal. i am merely new to liberal politics, and i am 100% against neo-republicans because they achieve the opposite of that which they say they will. for example, fiscal conservativism. yea, how many people are republicans because they want fiscal responsibility, and how much worse at fiscal responsibility are republicans than democrats?

also, the parties' policies have changed a bunch over the years. for example, repubs like to point out that lincoln was a repub. well yea he was but at that time repubs were the liberal party.

Actually, there's a significant segment of the republican party that consider small govt and fiscal conservatism an essential plank. Of course, GW is obv not one of 'em, and they got no love for him anyhoo. Point is, they're not the ones that get the press... it's the raving loonie "God hates homos" right fringe that the media loves to focus on cause, well, it's not really about educating anyone on anything meaningful, is it?

Same is true for the left... Uber-hypocritical hollywood aside, there's a significant segment of the liberal left that don't think gay marriage should be the defining bright line for who gets elected... that there are a few other things a bit more important... and have a few more substantive things to say than Michael Moorish "bush is antichrist... bad bad bad... arggghghhhhhhh!.... lets all move to Canada". (Actually, Moore's slide to irrelevance and demagoguery is pretty pathetic... the guy was a f-in genius with Roger and Me....)

So what do we get? A media that (for ratings sake) picks the loudest parts of the fringe from both parties and pounds us over the head with "these are your choices!"

bullsh!t....

[Galapogos]

I like it how sarbox always tries to find ways to dance around a profanity filter in his posts even though the only filter on this site is to eliminate ldo.

[sarbox68]

I like it how sarbox always tries to find ways to dance around a profanity filter in his posts even though the only filter on this site is to eliminate ldo.

Ifa I f-kin want to dance my b!tch-@s$ c*nt around this g()dd@m f-in filter $h!t then I'ma mutha-f-in do it.......

[wufwugy]

fwiw, i am not liberal. i am merely new to liberal politics, and i am 100% against neo-republicans because they achieve the opposite of that which they say they will. for example, fiscal conservativism. yea, how many people are republicans because they want fiscal responsibility, and how much worse at fiscal responsibility are republicans than democrats?

also, the parties' policies have changed a bunch over the years. for example, repubs like to point out that lincoln was a repub. well yea he was but at that time repubs were the liberal party.

Actually, there's a significant segment of the republican party that consider small govt and fiscal conservatism an essential plank. Of course, GW is obv not one of 'em, and they got no love for him anyhoo. Point is, they're not the ones that get the press... it's the raving loonie "God hates homos" right fringe that the media loves to focus on cause, well, it's not really about educating anyone on anything meaningful, is it?

Same is true for the left... Uber-hypocritical hollywood aside, there's a significant segment of the liberal left that don't think gay marriage should be the defining bright line for who gets elected... that there are a few other things a bit more important... and have a few more substantive things to say than Michael Moorish "bush is antichrist... bad bad bad... arggghghhhhhhh!.... lets all move to Canada". (Actually, Moore's slide to irrelevance and demagoguery is pretty pathetic... the guy was a f-in genius with Roger and Me....)

So what do we get? A media that (for ratings sake) picks the loudest parts of the fringe from both parties and pounds us over the head with "these are your choices!"

bullsh!t....

i agree

however, what i was referring to was how many fiscally conservative voters still vote for the non-fiscally conservatives of the republican party. not to mention that the right wing leaning media hates fiscal conservatives.

ron paul is a great example of a real fiscal conservative, and he got wiped out by the controllers of his party. imo had faux noise and the powers in repub party embraced ron paul he would now be annihilating obama in the polls.

[sarbox68]

Aaaahhhh...

eliminate the two party system including affiliate designation
require 100% public finance of campaigns, with fixed expenditure caps
mandate equal access substantive PSA advertising from all media outlets
institute mandatory nationally televised extended debate series under traditional cambridge rules and structure
establish government funded independent fact-checking group under either the DOJ or CBO
require standard judiciary oath ("tell the whole truth, nothing but...) at the outset from all candidates and prosecute obfuscation clearly identified by above independent fact-checking group as perjury

make gerrymandering a crime

.... things sarbox will do when he is king!