|
|
 Originally Posted by JKDS
Idk of wuf believes what he's been saying for the past year, or if he's just committed to a "debate style" of posting where you deny and obfuscate bad points and put all the good ones in the best frame...without consideration for truth
Examples?
Two things: (1) Taking me to task can be a task because I typically cover my bases and can argue my points well. It isn't enough for somebody to see something wrong with my points, but they have to beat them through their arguments. When they do, I concede and gladly state that I concede. I don't argue things I believe to be false and I argue things I believe to be true with tenaciousness. I imagine arguing with me can be quite frustrating because of some of the tactics I use, but they are legitimate (examples include things like framing my argument so that it's on offense and appropriation of quality elements of the counter-party that can fit into my argument). I never knowingly obfuscate or ignore facts/veracity.
(2) I trolled once. It was to an ex whom I wanted to stop bugging me. She thinks I'm a Nazi now.
|
Reply With Quote