need help with a phil paper

[aka_red]

because i'm lazy as shit...

its a 4-5 page paper where you just have to answer a question set from my teacher it doesn't need to have transitions or intro,thesis,body,conclusion so its really just answering the questions.

please pm me if your interested in helping me in exchange for something, pm me for more info. oh and its due tommorow so that may or may not deter you.

[EasyT]

I was a philosophy major. Been awhile. Shoot me one of the questions, and I'll decide.

[bikes]

[BennyLaRue]

need help with a phil paper

Phil was a man, a simple man. Phil liked cheesecake. He'd eat a whole cheesecake if you let him. One day, Phil was at the grocery store and met a woman with very long legs. She also had red, curly hair and a full bosom.

There. You're on your own from here.

[aka_red]

topic moral relativism and platos meno
length 4-5 pages
details which must be included:

explain the idea that the truth is relative. explain the main porblems with this view. (disagreement does not point ot relativity, we cannot learn anythingm we cannot discover that our beliefs are false, we cannot recognize wisdom, and the idea of moral relativism stops personal porgress) how can we account for the apparent differences we see in what people believe if relativism about the truth is false? (perspective: we all havea different understanding of what a triangle is)

this is one of about 5.

[Ragnar4]

topic moral relativism and platos meno
length 4-5 pages
details which must be included:

explain the idea that the truth is relative. explain the main porblems with this view. (disagreement does not point ot relativity, we cannot learn anythingm we cannot discover that our beliefs are false, we cannot recognize wisdom, and the idea of moral relativism stops personal porgress) how can we account for the apparent differences we see in what people believe if relativism about the truth is false? (perspective: we all havea different understanding of what a triangle is)

this is one of about 5.

Cave allegory > EZ paper.

[EasyT]

I studied linguistic philosophy. Hardly remember Plato's nonsense. One aspect of Linguistic philosophy talks about how the concept of 'apple' is relative. The true definition of apple might be red, edible & delicious. OR it might be that 'apple' is truly red, edible & delicious up until time X and thereafter is sandy and hard like granite. All our interaction with apples is true of both definitions preceding time X. All concepts are relative to that future point in time. Both definitions are valid. Kripke talked about this in his discussion of Wittgenstein.

Shit this garbage is all coming back. It hurts my braans.

EasyT

[EasyT]

The architect asks: "What does it look like?"
The engineer asks: "How do I build it?"
The philosopher asks: "Do you want fries with that?"