|
 Originally Posted by OngBonga
It's hilarious you keep referring to Canada. We were talking about how the monarchy was to blame for class in the UK, and you keep telling me how the income gap in Canada, a constitutional monarchy, is not as wide as it is in the UK.
Why is the income gap not as wide in Canada? Don't they have as many high paying jobs as we do?
I don't expect you to understand this because you've never been to Canada, but the royal family there is essentially a nominal part of the gov't. It's more a way of maintaining ties with the UK than anything else. No-one in Canada is expected to pledge allegiance to King Chuck. We stopped being your lackey a long time ago.
And I don't "blame" the royal family for perpetuating class system, if anything it's the upper classes who want to keep the monarchy as a reactionary response to the idea of progressive socialism.
More to the point, there is very little in the way of a landed aristocracy in Canada, certainly not in the West where I am from and I've never heard of it being the case in the East of Canada either. In the UK, 30% of the land is owned by a group of 1000 people. That's enormous wealth inequality.
|