|
|
 Originally Posted by Poopadoop
Yeah, there's a problem with boiling it down like that for sure.
The votes aren't simply a small percentage of votes overall, as 32/155,000 implies. It's a percentage of votes in three separate states all run independently. In order for the fraud to have happened, they'd have had to a) first identify which states they'd need the votes in before any votes were counted; and then b) ensure that enough fraudulent votes were "found" in each of those states to tip the election.
a) above is somewhat plausible. You could imagine a fraud conspiracy where they say 'states Q to Z are going to be close, let's focus our fraudulent activities on those.' But b) is not really plausible. How do you know that you will need (say) 6k votes in Georgia to win? If you really wanted to ensure that your side won, you wouldn't be looking for these small margins. You'd be pumping 100k votes or more into each of these states. Then you have to find a way to cover it up, independently, in each of these states. High officials in each of those states would have to be complicit in the fraud and cover up. There can't be any traces left in even one of those states because it will cause the whole thing to unravel. It'd require a level of organisation that would make D-Day look like a picnic on the beach.
I'm not saying it would be completely impossible to pull off, but it does seem extremely unlikely given it would require human beings to be in charge of the planning and execution of it.
Like MMM, you're trying to debate whether the election was stolen. That's not the topic. The topic is the politics of pushing that idea as a Republican politician right now.
I don't disagree with either of you. You're just trying to go into another topic that's not what I'm talking about here.
|
Reply With Quote