|
|
 Originally Posted by spoonitnow
The point is that she can't exercise control over her body when she is coerced into sex, but you can't understand that because you benefit from the power structures of the patriarchy.
Coerced? By willingly drinking and going back to a man's apartment?
Going back to a man's apartment does not give him the right to rape you
Agreed. But it's not rape if you say yes.
If you're at a man's apartment, and he says he's going to get a condom, you can't say no because you don't know if he's going to beat the shit out of you and not let you leave.
WHAAAAAAATTTT??? So we're just assuming that every man is a violent abuser until he proves otherwise? That's fucking bullshit.
But also, if that's really the standard you're going with...then you should be choosier about who's apartment you go back to after a date. I mean, if it's your assumption that a man will beat you if you say no, then why would you ever put yourself in that position if it's your intention to say no?
He should respond to all of the cues that show I'm not interested.
Which cues were those? Was it when she took her panties off, sat on his kitchen counter and spread her legs so he could fit his face in there?
This is typical of straight, white, cisgender males who have never went a day in their lives without being in power
If anything you're saying is true....I should be getting laid way more.
|
Reply With Quote