|
|
 Originally Posted by BananaStand
I posed perfectly plausible explanations for the alleged impropriety, and I posed compelling and salient challenges to the theories of guilt.
Your explanations are only plausible on the assumption that Trump is innocent and has the capacity for some measure of self-control. Given the lack of evidence for these premises, there's no reason to find the rest of your arguments compelling.
Originally Posted by BananaStand
News Flash!!! That bullshit is WHY Trump won. So keep it up.
Trump won because people accused his followers of being mindless sheep? Lol, ok then.
|
Reply With Quote