|
 Originally Posted by BananaStand
If Trump was guilty, you would know by now.
First, we don't know what he's possibly guilty of. That's one thing.
Second, just because they don't find the smoking gun on day one or week one or year one of the investigation doesn't mean they have nothing and are just farting around wasting taxpayer money. Plenty of investigations take longer than this one and end up proving someone guilty. So sorry, but there's no time limit on how long they get to uncover the evidence, where if it takes longer than 'x' you get to conclude the person must be innocent.
 Originally Posted by BananaStand
If Trump was guilty, his play would be to delay as much as possible.
How might he go about that? Assuming of course that's a good strategy. And in what way has he been doing the opposite?
 Originally Posted by BananaStand
I assume his SOP would be to deflect attention from the investigation whenever possible.
He seems to be doing the opposite.
Or it could be to try to discredit it in any way possible, which is exactly the opposite.
 Originally Posted by BananaStand
If Trump was guilty, then Mueller would still be waiting to talk to Bannon, Kushner, Spicer, Preibus, Sessions, and others.
How do you know he isn't? Also, what's your interpretation of Mueller wanting to interview Trump himself? Just wanting to shoot the breeze?
 Originally Posted by BananaStand
EDIT: He would also be playing the "But Hillary was worse" card ALOT stronger. He could lock her up tomorrow if he really wanted to.
Ya because that's what every arch-criminal says - sure I'm a criminal but so-and-so was worse. Lock THEM up, not me! Lol, right.
Basically, your argument starts out with 'he's innocent' and tries to see everything through that prism. I'm not saying he's guilty, but you already have the case decided in your mind based on whatever theories happen to suit.
Let's just see what happens.
|