^Well, I see it differently. "My side" acknowledges a problem that needs addressing, the "other side" does not. What should be done and what would be viable are a subject for an entirely different discussion, first we must decide to act.

What we could do, right now, for example:

- Replace coal and natural gas with nuclear, solar, geothermal, wind etc.
- Carbon taxes
- Emission and fuel economy regulations
- Stop deforestation
- Carbon harvesting and storage

What you're in essence saying, is that not all of those methods are viable or economical, so we shouldn't do anything. I might be in agreement that it's starting to be too late avoid a shitty outcome, but I don't have any stock options to lose on fossil fuels, and I do actually give a damn, so I'm all for at least trying.