06-27-2018 05:10 AM
#1
| |
| |
06-27-2018 09:06 PM
#2
| |
![]() ![]()
|
Absolutely, yet there is a catch: unintended consequences. Any system of sustainable error solving has to also solve the unintended consequences, most of which are not known or identified (hence unintended) at the time of implementation. The best functioning system is then not one that solves for errors given current knowledge and the current status, but solves for errors given future/potential knowledge and future/potential status. A system that sustainably solves problems isn't one that applies a known solution to a known problem; instead, it uses a known function to solve unknown problems, roughly speaking. |
06-28-2018 08:37 AM
#3
| |
Agreed, the system needs to be self-correcting. It's just that I'm unconvinced that the market forces, in effect evolution, is the most efficient solution in all cases. The correcting effect of trial and error is limited, in most cases just to the one making the error and some of those immediately around him, if even that, but certainly not the whole population at once. For every error that "makes it to the news" there are thousands that don't. This means the same errors are made over and over again before they become "known". | |
| |
06-28-2018 09:18 PM
#4
| |
![]() ![]()
|
Do the predetermined rules have unintended consequences? |
06-29-2018 05:10 PM
#5
| |
They might, that's why I suggested the rules need to be measured and revised is they don't work as intended. | |
| |
06-29-2018 09:35 PM
#6
| |
![]() ![]()
|
Would a more robust function for trial and error be better for measuring and revising? |
06-30-2018 03:32 AM
#7
| |
I don't know, what is a more robust function for trial and error? | |
| |
06-28-2018 09:32 PM
#8
| |
![]() ![]()
|
When dealing with the non-experimental, answers are certainly knowable, yet nobody knows how to know them. |
06-29-2018 03:30 PM
#9
| |
I'm pretty sure, in this context, CoccoBill refers to killing other people and stealing stuff also from others. | |
| |
06-29-2018 09:27 PM
#10
| |
![]() ![]()
| |
Last edited by wufwugy; 06-29-2018 at 09:36 PM. | |
06-27-2018 09:39 PM
#11
| |
![]() ![]()
|
I have another response to this. |
06-28-2018 11:02 AM
#12
| |
I agree, but I don't agree. | |
06-28-2018 12:50 PM
#13
| |
| |
Last edited by oskar; 06-28-2018 at 12:59 PM.
| |
06-28-2018 12:52 PM
#14
| |
well, there goes the Nobel Prize. | |
06-28-2018 01:34 PM
#15
| |
![]() ![]()
|
Check and mate |