|
|
 Originally Posted by BananaStand
Who's making that determination?? I posted an article yesterday where a shrink admits to having no justifiable reason to involuntarily admit a man to a psychiatric facility against his will. Yet she did it anyway because SHE decided that it would be cool if he weren't allowed to buy a gun.
I would rather let maniacs have guns than let doctors lock up innocent people and remove their rights without due process.
I would rather try to improve both situations than throw my hands up in the air and wave them like I just don't care.
Originally Posted by BananaStand
Lunatics can't get guns. If someone has been adjudicated as mentally ill, they can't buy a gun.
Convicted felons, can't buy guns either.
C'mon you know better, they can just (for example) go online and buy a gun, or if it's not a federal crime they can go to some other state or other bs like that.
Originally Posted by BananaStand
Teh capitol police, which protects members of congress, is armed with semi-automatic weapons, high-ammo clips, and all that shit. So I have a real fucking problem with a member of congress saying "yes we need these weapons to protect us, but you don't need them to protect your family" That's fucking bullshit.
Well that's a completely separate issue. You might though have difficulty finding people there if they weren't protected.
|
Reply With Quote