|
|
 Originally Posted by boost
You're letting your silly axioms force you into absurd positions. No one has or will ever have a reason to individually own a nuclear weapon. Even if you want to argue some crazy edge case, I'll simply point out that it'd be such an edge case that the regime necessary to train, evaluate, and regulate individuals' ownership of nuclear weapons would be so wasteful that it simply makes more sense to just not allow it.
I envision that expense falling on the owner. I.e. the cost of all the background is billed to the owner.
Originally Posted by boost
I'm afraid that if we can't get passed this, we're stuck at a standstill.
If you understand my position, then we're at the goal.
Of course we're at a standstill when we've gotten to the point.
I'm not claiming I'm right; I'm sharing my opinions.
I'm not trying to change your mind; I'm explaining my mind.
|
Reply With Quote