*** The Official MAGAposting thread ***

[wufwugy]

Super neat how no counterpoints are made yet I am still attacked.

Like shooting fish in a barrel.

[Savy]

Super neat how no counterpoints are made yet I am still attacked.

Like shooting fish in a barrel.

I'm shitposting lolololol

.....

Look at everyone attacking me whilst I'm shitposting lololololol

[wufwugy]

I'm shitposting lolololol

.....

Look at everyone attacking me whilst I'm shitposting lololololol

The posts here are quite different than in the shitposting thread.

When people find things you believe disagreeable, the trick is to tell them things they either have a hard time disagreeing with or that they would have to spend brain time formulating an argument against, and then watch them not address the claims and instead address you with negativity.

[Savy]

The posts here are quite different than in the shitposting thread.

When people find things you believe disagreeable, the trick is to tell them things they either have a hard time disagreeing with or that they would have to spend brain time formulating an argument against, and then watch them not address the claims and instead address you with negativity.

The posts I think are funny and the posts I agree with aren't the same.

Also my original post wasn't taken seriously enough in terms of the regard you should take for your craft because what is happening to you isn't the same as a court jester.

Also also see lots of points made in my post about how I disagree with the google chap.

[wufwugy]

The posts I think are funny and the posts I agree with aren't the same.

Also my original post wasn't taken seriously enough in terms of the regard you should take for your craft because what is happening to you isn't the same as a court jester.

Also also see lots of points made in my post about how I disagree with the google chap.

I'm sorry I wasn't clear. I wasn't referring to you. In my experience you have always been fair and logical.

[Savy]

I'm sorry I wasn't clear. I wasn't referring to you. In my experience you have always been fair and logical.

I've always said I'm a great guy and anyone who disagrees is a cunt.

If you're trying to convince people or something, and I'm not saying you are, then maybe the least important thing should be them.

[wufwugy]

I've always said I'm a great guy and anyone who disagrees is a cunt.

If you're trying to convince people or something, and I'm not saying you are, then maybe the least important thing should be them.

Could you clarify your final point? Are you getting at the idea that disagreement with a person is one of the least effective ways to change that specific person's mind? If you are, I agree entirely. The phenomenon is pretty huge.

[MadMojoMonkey]

Super neat how no counterpoints are made yet I am still attacked.

Like shooting fish in a barrel.

Where's the attack?
My "marginalizes" point or was it poopadoop's "vacuousness" comment, 'cause either way, you're assuming false victimization to call either a personal attack.
You hypocrite.


Now... who do you think you're calling out, here? Why should we offer counterpoints to the idiots you're making fun of? They're legit idiots, from any side of any aisle.
Furthermore... what points? Those memes you've posted? IDK where to even begin to unravel your use of imagery to vilify a position no one holds, here. Take this thread to reddit and I'm sure you'll find a room full of idiots who are more than happy to spout their half-baked ideas to both support and refute your points.

You're picking on idiots, and waiting for them to argue with you. This reduces you to mocking idiots, which is, at best, an idiotic thing to do.
If you think we hold those opinions, then you're being a jerk who has ignored every intelligent conversation we've had with you.

[wufwugy]

If you think we hold those opinions, then you're being a jerk who has ignored every intelligent conversation we've had with you.

I don't think you hold those opinions (which is in part why I posted them), yet I am (and my views are) treated as stupid and oppositional. One can see where I'm coming from now.

[MadMojoMonkey]

I don't think you hold those opinions (which is in part why I posted them), yet I am (and my views are) treated as stupid and oppositional. One can see where I'm coming from now.

Who cares if haters gonna hate, man?

I can't speak for anyone but myself, but I'm impressed with how much you've changed and incorporated new ideas over the years. Some of those ideas got a lot of pushback from discussions here, and now you hold them. Certainly not the mark of a stupid person, IMO.

I'm sorry if you feel like you're getting attacked. You do come across as just looking for an argument a lot, and I think you have cultivated that with purpose. Being argumentative is gonna rub most people the wrong way at least some of the time. You're just different than some people looking for arguments because of the reason I noted above: you're actually interested in incorporating new, good ideas. Your method of figuring out if an idea sounds good or is good sometimes is to adopt the idea fully and see where it gets you. I don't fully get that attitude, but I respect that it's leading you to deeper understanding of who you are and what you stand for.

Don't let the haters slow you down.

You got this.

[wufwugy]

Now... who do you think you're calling out, here? Why should we offer counterpoints to the idiots you're making fun of? They're legit idiots, from any side of any aisle.

I've been thinking about this because your comment is the base for me realizing some of my own incoherence of thought. It's that the stuff I have posted is in part because I think you guys agree with it but also don't agree with it. I think maybe I have defined an idea by its worst elements (which isn't necessarily wrong, but also not necessarily right). Since your comment, each time I wanted to post something, I have had to ask the question of myself if it's a mischaracterization of the opinions of those on this board, and usually it seems to be so I haven't posted much since. That said, I think the reason why I automatically think they're not mischaracterizations is by this logic: take the Onion one for example, I think that is the inevitable outcome of sufficient enough government intervention into the college system. But you don't see it that way; therefore the Onion piece can seem to me like it's not a mischaracterization of what comes of your professed beliefs even though it is an explicit mischaracterization of your professed beliefs.

Anyways, congrats. I tend to revisit criticisms sent my way, and that one comment basically got me to reconsider the intent of this thread.