|
|
 Originally Posted by OngBonga
We're blaming them without proof. All we're claiming is it's a Russian nerve agent, so we should prove that to them if we want a serious response from them.
On what planet are we interested in giving them a chance to dispute our claim it was them? Either we say 'we know it's you and no fuck off you can't come see the agent - you already know what it is you cunts', or we say 'hmm, not sure who this was - Russia wanna help us figure it out?' We've already chosen option 1, and so not letting them come in on the investigation is completely consistent with that.
In other words, denying Russia access to the evidence is completely undiagnostic as to whether or who did it. It's only diagnostic to who we claim did it.
|