|
|
 Originally Posted by BananaStand
You really wanna play this game bro?
I wouldn't mind but it seems pointless because I don't defend lobbying. I was just pointing out that it seems hypocritical to attack Hilary for lobbying when Trump also did it, and allegedly a lot more than that.
Originally Posted by wufwugy
You game?
Seems a bit lopsided since my avatar is awesome, and you'll be happy to change yours once Trump starts tweeting about Hilary from jail.
Originally Posted by wufwugy
if Trump ... removes due to health issues.
Oh, he will try!
Honestly man, is this really what you think of Trump voters?
You're right. It seems unfair to stereotype people based on the group they associate with. To see someone with a maga hat and think: there's someone who doesn't mind if the super rich pay off politicians to legislate based on corporate interest - They don't appreciate that. To ban people from entering your establishment purely for their ideology or party of origin. That's just unconstitutional. To see an america-first flair and assume this is a person who values the ramblings of an uneducated ideologue higher than the scientific consensus on climate science, that's straight up racism. That's a hate crime!
In terms of directly damaging. I don't know of you care about things that affect people that are not you. His stance on DACA could be massively damaging for those affected, and doesn't seem to have a clear purpose other than appealing to his core voter base. Same with the muslim ban and the unnecessary and cruel practice of separating asylum seekers from their children.
I don't want to speculate on the potential crimes because that will come out sooner or later. In terms of economy and foreign policy, that's a tug boat, not a race car. I'd give it at least a couple of years.
|
Reply With Quote