Still waiting to see why the math was wrong?

During the Obama ERA we added $10 Trillion in health care costs. MFA promises to reduce that by $2 Trillion.

But only if we completely surrender control of healthcare to the government. And only if we accept the real likelihood that quality of care will suffer. And only if we accept the risk that the democrats could be just as wrong as they were the first time when they promised cost reductions and instead jacked up the price by $10 Trillion.

I'm saying, that if a free market solution is more than 20% effective at undoing those changes, then it's more +EV than MFA.

Does that math not check out?