|
|
 Originally Posted by oskar
Banana, if the entirety of your argument boils down to whataboutism... I don't think I can explain to you any more clearly why this isn't sound.
Maybe your IQ just isn't high enough to understand why the comparison is relevant.
In any event, you still haven't answered the question why this meeting, or it's subsequent cover-up, matters. Explain to me what's so bad about the meeting, and why was Trump wrong to try and cover it up?
Then the next question will be "what does it mean?"
And if you're going to say that it means he can't be president, then the next obvious question is..."who should be?" And that's where the Hillary comparisons become apt. Because she was the only other choice, and she's just as guilty of whatever bad behavior you think Trump is guilty of here. And we have to pick one of those two.
If your gripe here is "I can't believe we have a president who thought it was ok to get opposition research from Russia" then fine. Ok. That's a legit gripe.
But how could we have had a different outcome? What should we do about it now? And why? Without answering those questions, all you're doing is throwing a the type of crybaby sore loser temper tantrum that is symptomatic of fully metastasized Trump Derangement Syndrome.
Baby want a bottle now?
|
Reply With Quote