*** The Official MAGAposting thread ***

[Poopadoop]

Fuck this game. What exactly are you even talking about?

Are you telling me that Trump ordered McGahn to commit perjury?

Are you telling me he ordered him to release a public statement containing a lie, but not to repeat that lie to Mueller?

[TheSpoonald]

Are you telling me he ordered him to release a public statement containing a lie, but not to repeat that lie to Mueller?

Cite your source please so I know what the fuck you're talking about.

[Poopadoop]

Cite your source please so I know what the fuck you're talking about.

The Mueller Report. Don't know the page number, sorry.

[TheSpoonald]

The Mueller Report. Don't know the page number, sorry.

Are you saying that Mueller found evidence that Trump ordered McGahn to commit perjury? Or are you not saying that?

Pick one. If it's the latter...fuck off.

[Poopadoop]

Are you saying that Mueller found evidence that Trump ordered McGahn to commit perjury? Or are you not saying that?

Pick one. If it's the latter...fuck off.

Read the next post and answer the question please. Why would this be reported in the context of items of obstruction of justice. Do you think this means Mueller is trying to convince the reader that Trump didn't try to OJ?

[Poopadoop]

In case that's still too complicated for you, let me explain it a different way.

In your view, this information I'm referring to about orders given to McGahn is irrelevant. The question is why an experienced prosecutor would include irrelevant information in a report. Presumably he knows better than you or I whether or not it's relevant?

[TheSpoonald]

In case that's still too complicated for you, let me explain it a different way.

In your view, this information I'm referring to about orders given to McGahn is irrelevant. The question is why an experienced prosecutor would include irrelevant information in a report. Presumably he knows better than you or I whether or not it's relevant?

I'm wondering why you presume to read the mind of an experienced prosecutor.

There are really two theories on your question. Either A) Mueller is either a leftwing or never-trump partisan hack simply seeking to complicate this administration. B) Mueller is a rightwing partisan hack throwing chum in the water for simple-minded DNC sharks to waste their energy on a fake feeding frenzy.

More likely than either of those though is that Mueller was just trying to do a job that was a sham anyway. He had to write something, so he wrote that, because it's something, and something is more than nothing and he couldn't write nothing.

[Poopadoop]

I'm wondering why you presume to read the mind of an experienced prosecutor.

I'm wondering why you wonder that when you're perfectly willing to presume to understand him better than I do.

There are really two theories on your question. Either A) Mueller is either a leftwing or never-trump partisan hack simply seeking to complicate this administration. B) Mueller is a rightwing partisan hack throwing chum in the water for simple-minded DNC sharks to waste their energy on a fake feeding frenzy.

More likely than either of those though is that Mueller was just trying to do a job that was a sham anyway. He had to write something, so he wrote that, because it's something, and something is more than nothing and he couldn't write nothing.

These are all quite unlikely scenarios, as opposed to the idea that he actually took his job seriously and laid out evidence relating to the questions at hand.

Occam's Razor.