|
 Originally Posted by Poopadoop
I don't care what Tucker Carlson or Rachel Maddow (or you for that matter) think the Mueller Report means;
There's a difference between 'not caring' and deliberately being contrary because of your compulsive oppositional defiance disorder.
No you don't
I look for reports of what the substance of the report is, and what the underlying laws are. Then I reach my own conclusions.
No, you clearly don't give a fuck what the law is. Don't try to play that game. And you're not looking at the substance of the report. You're cherry picking confirmation bias to support the conclusions you inferred in the beginning. For example, you keep saying that Trump "tried" to fire Mueller. That's not in the report man.
That doesn't mean they're the correct ones, and I'm aware of that. But they are mine and they aren't reached because I watched two different people give polar opposite bullshit interpretations, and then pick the bullshit I prefer.
That's not how I reach my conclusions either. The point of consuming polar opposite news sources is because you can conclude that anywhere they overlap, are facts.
|