*** The Official MAGAposting thread ***

[TheSpoonald]

I don't care what Tucker Carlson or Rachel Maddow (or you for that matter) think the Mueller Report means;

There's a difference between 'not caring' and deliberately being contrary because of your compulsive oppositional defiance disorder.

I ignore that.

No you don't

I look for reports of what the substance of the report is, and what the underlying laws are. Then I reach my own conclusions.

No, you clearly don't give a fuck what the law is. Don't try to play that game. And you're not looking at the substance of the report. You're cherry picking confirmation bias to support the conclusions you inferred in the beginning. For example, you keep saying that Trump "tried" to fire Mueller. That's not in the report man.

That doesn't mean they're the correct ones, and I'm aware of that. But they are mine and they aren't reached because I watched two different people give polar opposite bullshit interpretations, and then pick the bullshit I prefer.

That's not how I reach my conclusions either. The point of consuming polar opposite news sources is because you can conclude that anywhere they overlap, are facts.

[Poopadoop]

There's a difference between 'not caring' and deliberately being contrary because of your compulsive oppositional defiance disorder.

This sounds more like you than anyone I know, frankly.

No you don't

You're right. I laugh at it. That's not the same as believing it though.

ONG-ANA.jpg

(I have no reason to take any of that rant seriously.)

That's not how I reach my conclusions either. The point of consuming polar opposite news sources is because you can conclude that anywhere they overlap, are facts.

Well great, all you need to do is find that 1% of the time they overlap and you now know 1% of the facts while exposing yourself to 99% bullshit. But I guess if you believe 50% of that bullshit then I can see why you'd do it.

[TheSpoonald]

(I have no reason to take any of that rant seriously.)

"shut up" he explained

Well great, all you need to do is find that 1% of the time they overlap and you now know 1% of the facts while exposing yourself to 99% bullshit.

Is it really 99 to 1? Citation needed.

And you're just dodging the question. How are you getting unbiased news? Where is this magic fountain of facts?

[Poopadoop]

"shut up" he explained

I just see no reason to prolong an argument so you can rant and rave and call me names.

Is it really 99 to 1? Citation needed.

How much do you think it is?

And you're just dodging the question. How are you getting unbiased news? Where is this magic fountain of facts?

Why? You'll just argue it's biased.


More generally, and I'm being completely open about my bias here, there's really no reason for me to talk to you other than it's fun to demolish some of the stupid things and tortured logic you come up with. It's like the feeling you get when you slap around a bully. That's my whole reason for engaging with you. It's certainly not because I ever learn anything.

[TheSpoonald]

Why? You'll just argue it's biased.

"Shut up" he explained