|
|
I don't care what "historically" happened with walls. Right now, there are two hyper-effective walls in existence keeping riff raff out of countries that don't want them. Whatever problems walls have historically had....is fixed. New prototypes could not be breached by seriously able-bodied and extraordinarily determined soldiers. They had ladders.
So the fact is, I don't know all of the ways humans have thought up to breach a wall. Nor do I know all the ways humans have thought up to prevent it. But I know someone has, and what they came up with is pretty fucking effective. Just look at the damn chart!
So I'm all done with the "is the wall effective?" talk. Hell fucking yes it is. And I realize that "other stuff" has to exist to make it work, that doesn't mean that "other stuff" is better (it's not), or that anyone ever advocated having a wall without "other stuff". Everyone agrees, you need a wall and other stuff to secure a border. If you have just a wall, or just other stuff, it's better than having neither, but nowhere near effective as both. If any of that is ambiguous or disputed by anyone, go fuck yourself.
Can we please talk about something else today?
|