|
 Originally Posted by TheSpoonald
Not even close to what I said. You can no longer accuse me of ad reducium bananicus .
I was asking if you thought what I stated or not, not ascribing that thought to you. Subtle yet important difference there.
So, if you accept that you can vote for someone without agreeing with every single one of their stated positions (do you?, or is the fact that you objected to my question to the contrary mean you don't accept that but preferred to change the topic?), then:
1. It's possible at least some people who voted for Capt. Retard did not want a wall.
2. It's impossible to determine what % of people want or don't want a wall based on the results of the 2016 election.
Ergo, your argument that the election reflected the will of the people vis-a-vis the wall is unsupported.
|