*** The Official MAGAposting thread ***

[OngBonga]

Same is true in the UK, fwiw. France is perfectly safe, so those at Calais wanting to come here are economic migrants who have chosen the UK for economic reasons.

[Poopadoop]

Same is true in the UK, fwiw. France is perfectly safe, so those at Calais wanting to come here are economic migrants who have chosen the UK for economic reasons.

Does this mean France shouldn't have to treat them humanely, or if some of them swam over to Dover that the UK wouldn't have to treat them humanely?

Or is there some other way in which this is relevant to the discussion of human rights abuses at the US border?

Combine harvester?

[Poopadoop]

I wonder if a lawyer would ever argue in court that his client deserves a light sentence because he only raped a single child when he was a Boy Scout leader and the guy who had the job before him actually raped three.

[OngBonga]

I wonder if a lawyer would ever argue in court that his client deserves a light sentence because he only raped a single child when he was a Boy Scout leader and the guy who had the job before him actually raped three.

Oh look, you went back to comparing not providing soap with terrible crimes.

A lawyer would argue that stealing 5 marbles warrants a lower sentence than stealing 10 marbles.

[Poopadoop]

Oh look, you went back to comparing not providing soap with terrible crimes.

Oh look you went back to arguing that an analogy is a direct comparison.

A lawyer would argue that stealing 5 marbles warrants a lower sentence than stealing 10 marbles.

Actually he wouldn't because he's a lawyer and it's not his job to point out the stupidly obvious to a judge. He also wouldn't compare it to stealing 11 marbles, 6 marbles, or 300 billion marbles. He also woudn't say it's not as bad as a human rights abuse because that's also stupidly obvious.

[OngBonga]

Allow me to sum up your position...

1. Human rights abuses at the border are bad and should be stopped.

2. This is analogous to, but not directly comparable to, killing Jews and raping boy scouts

3. Arrgggh, Trump!

Is that about right?

[Poopadoop]

Allow me to sum up your position...

1. Human rights abuses at the border are bad and should be stopped.

2. Ong doesn't understand how to interpret an analogy.

3. Ong would like to try to make the discussion about 'arrrggghghg! illegal immigrants!', 'arrrggghghg, Obama' or 'arghghg, Hillary', rather than simply agree with 1. above, even though he does agree with 1. above. He even took a stab at mentioning Brexit but I didn't take the bait.

4. Captain Retard is a shit president.

fyp

[Poopadoop]

So, in the end I sum up your position as follows:

1. Human rights abuses at the border are bad and should be stopped.

2. Shit could be worse.

3. Arrgggh, immigrants!

Is that about it?

[OngBonga]

So, in the end I sum up your position as follows:

1. Human rights abuses at the border are bad and should be stopped.

2. Shit could be worse.

3. Arrgggh, illegal immigrants!

Is that about it?

FYP