btw mmm, "bait you into responding" ?
You said the bottom line is: guns against tyranny is your hill to die on. I asked you to show me a single historic precedent of privately owned guns being successfully used against tyranny, and you declared that I am being too emotional and you need not respond any further. I would love for you to respond because I am convinced that your entire argument falls apart if you allowed yourself to examine it.
Reply With Quote