Quote Originally Posted by oskar
I haven't heard of anyone suggesting this was bad because they have intimate feelings about Soleimani. This is bad because at best this ends with an exchange of airstrikes and a couple hundred civilian casualties, and at worst it's all-out war with Iran and hundreds of thousand civilian casualties.

Reading up on the Bethlehem Doctrine... interesting stuff. When did lying become this complicated?
Best case scenario is Iran shit themselves and do not further antogonise a very unpredictable and powerful enemy. When generals get droned, that's a game changer. Suddenly the Mullahs themselves are thinking they could be next. Worst case scenario, yeah all out war. The Mullahs themselves are unpredictable, and they do have powerful allies.

Reportedly Iran put an $80M bounty on Trump's head. I said 3 years ago Trump is going to get either impeached or assassinated before his term is over. If it's both, that would be so nice.
It's amusing you have enough insight to recognise the potential problems Trump's aggression might cause, yet you sit here and say that you'd be glad if he got assassinated, completely oblivious to the shitstorm that would create, ie civil war. On the one hand, you're anti-war when it comes to the Middle East, and on the other you're pro-war when it comes to internal USA politics. Do you really hate USA that much?