*** The Official MAGAposting thread ***

[oskar]

This is hilarious, and obviously not scripted at all.

I have to catch up on RNC clips. So far it has been up to my expectations.


This is also a big thing again:



At 1 min. he starts talking about raking the forest floors once again. The big toot-toot truck behind him is also a nice touch.

[Poopadoop]

At 1 min. he starts talking about raking the forest floors once again.

The other day the governor of Calif. was on twitter saying Trump cut off his disaster relief funding because he wasn't raking the forest floors, which is why (according to Trump) they keep having all those fires.

[OngBonga]

I don't want to alert you any further but all-black schools do already exist in the US, and you won't believe why!

Well this is racial segregation. Do you support racial segregation?

[OngBonga]

On the other hand when there are talks at the other end of the world to maybe open one racially segregated dorm sometime next year, you switch to all-out panic mode.

Wait, this implies racism? Me not wanting a world where people are raciall sgregated makes me racist?

Holy fucking fuck.

[oskar]

Wait, this implies racism? Me not wanting a world where people are raciall sgregated makes me racist?

Holy fucking fuck.

Yes. Because to you black households having 1/20th the networth of white households doesn't imply systemic racism. To you blacks being stopped and searched at 10 times the rate of whites doesn't imply racism... but when NYU is announcing that it has plans to open a black-only dorm, then the white race is on the verge of extinction!
The discrepancy implies racism.

Well this is racial segregation. Do you support racial segregation?

No, I think it's a bad idea.

By the way, a snowflake wouldn't continue to argue with people who disagree. I'm the only right winger here, and I continue to engage with you guys because frankly it's more fun to discuss subjects with people who you disagree with than to seek out echo chambers. That isn't snowflake behaviour. A snowflake cries when someone disagrees, and then blocks them or ignores them or insults them.

That I can agree with.

[OngBonga]

Yes. Because to you black households having 1/20th the networth of white households doesn't imply systemic racism. To you blacks being stopped and searched at 10 times the rate of whites doesn't imply racism... but when NYU is announcing that it has plans to open a black-only dorm, then the white race is on the verge of extinction!
The discrepancy implies racism.

What can I say? I think racial segregation is worse than the cops stopping people and asking what they're doing or checking their bags.

[boost]

What can I say? I think racial segregation is worse than the cops stopping people and asking what they're doing or checking their bags.

A black person can't exist in the world without a heightened chance of an adversarial encounter with an armed authority vs a white person can go to any school and house in any dorm except for a minuscule fraction of them. I don't know any details about the black dorm, that said, it doesn't sound particularly helpful or necessary, but you're out of your mind if you think that's the bigger issue.

[OngBonga]

I'm going to ask myself a few questions, and will answer honestly.

Do I think my race is superior to any others? No.
Do I discriminate against other races, or support discrimination of other races? No.
Do I hate other races, or tolerate other peoples' hatred for other races? No.

Ergo, I am not racist.

You guys might well think I should answer yes to the second and third question, but that's because you are assuming the police in the UK are racist, and I support that racism. That's not true. I don't believe the police are racist, and if it's proven that I am wrong, I will not support such racism.

I am either right, there is no problem with institutional racism in the UK police, or I am wrong and ignorant. Ignorance is not racism.

[Poopadoop]

if it's proven that I am wrong, I will not support such racism.

It's been proven beyond a reasonable suspicion, and you deny that proof.

If you say you're against rape but would not convict someone of it if there was any possible other explanation you could conceivably conjure up, however unlikely, for the women's bruises and the cum in her pussy, you're not really against rape are you.

[OngBonga]

By the way, a snowflake wouldn't continue to argue with people who disagree. I'm the only right winger here, and I continue to engage with you guys because frankly it's more fun to discuss subjects with people who you disagree with than to seek out echo chambers. That isn't snowflake behaviour. A snowflake cries when someone disagrees, and then blocks them or ignores them or insults them.

[OngBonga]

First, it's not a criminal case and I don't have to prove any individual guilty. So there's that.

Racism is a very serious accusation, especially against law enforcement, so the standard of proof should be the same as in court.

Second, there's no altenative explanation that doesn't involve blaming the victims and saying they're asking for it. So there's that too.

Here you go again with victim mentality. People are not victims for simply being stopped by the police.

If the racism argument isn't true, something else has to be causing it. You haven't provided anything remotely plausible to explain those numbers.

I appreciate I'm speculating, and probably have not identified the reasons why there are statistical anomalies. But to say it's racism is equally as speculative. You have only one answer.

[Poopadoop]

Racism is a very serious accusation, especially against law enforcement, so the standard of proof should be the same as in court.

I'm not accusing any individual cop of racism, I'm saying it is evident in their overall pattern of stop and searches.

ere you go again with victim mentality. People are not victims for simply being stopped by the police.

So if you got stopped and searched by the police for no reason other than that you're white, you'd be ok with that?

I appreciate I'm speculating, and probably have not identified the reasons why there are statistical anomalies.

Not one, except that maybe black people mouth off a lot.

But to say it's racism is equally as speculative. You have only one answer.

I've just noted the most obvious interpretation. The fact you can't come up with anything remotely plausible as an alternatve suggests it's probably the correct one. If it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck...