*** The Official MAGAposting thread ***

[OngBonga]

No, show me the law that says damaging property is only illegal if it's privately owned.

Wait, weren't we talking about looting a minute ago? When did the convo shift to criminal damage?

You were trying to argue that the Capitol was looted. That isn't true.

[Poopadoop]

You were trying to argue that the Capitol was looted. That isn't true.

Give it up.

[OngBonga]

Give it up.

This is you reducing the conversation, not me. You outright refuse to engage with me in a sincere manner.

[Poopadoop]

You outright refuse to engage with me in a sincere manner.

I don't try to talk about serious issues with the 6 year old who lives next door either. I don't expect him to have done his homework.

And experience shows you don't do yours either (even though unlike him you're capable of understanding it) because you can't be bothered.

[OngBonga]

I don't try to talk about serious issues with the 6 year old who lives next door either. I don't expect him to have done his homework.

And experience shows you don't do yours either (even though unlike him you're capable of understanding it) because you can't be bothered.

What you do is instantly take an opposing position to anything I say. Instantly. That you refuse to acknowledge any kind of difference between an attack on government and an attack on civilians is evidence of your insincerity. You asked me what the difference was between what you call looting in the Capitol, and the looting of 2020, I told you, and you didn't go "ok that makes some sense", instead you try to go down the path of saying law does not distinguish between looting and criminal damage (it does), and then tell me to give it up as though I'm the one talking shit.

And you're calling people criminals for walking into a building.

[Poopadoop]

What you do is instantly take an opposing position to anything I say. Instantly.

If it seems like that, it's only because I disagree with 99% of what you say. I can't help that, sorry.

That you refuse to acknowledge any kind of difference between an attack on government and an attack on civilians is evidence of your insincerity. You asked me what the difference was between what you call looting in the Capitol, and the looting of 2020, I told you, and you didn't go "ok that makes some sense", instead you try to go down the path of saying law does not distinguish between looting and criminal damage (it does), and then tell me to give it up as though I'm the one talking shit.

And you're calling people criminals for walking into a building.

Even your language here is self-contradictory. First you use the word "attack" and then by the end of it you make it sound like the Trumpers were a bunch of tourists just walked into a building and looked around.

Oskar has already explained to you the obvious distinction between what the BLM protests were about and what the Trumpers were doing. So I'm not going to bother with that again.

And more generally, this and your other posts about gov't vs. civlian property shows your general approach to any debate. Once it's clear you're getting shot down in flames you try to shift the argument to some tedious point that doesn't really matter in the larger scheme of things. Like it's somehow relevant whether the Trumpers were acting on private or public property when they tried their little half-assed coup attempt.