*** The Official MAGAposting thread ***

[Poopadoop]

Yeah, I mean lol that there's an "objective" (to use Ong's term) case to be made for election fraud in the US.

Just like how he "objectively" tars us all with the same brush of being happy to ignore the fraud and the massive cover up of the fraud (by Republicans too no less) by thousands of people, including election officials and Trump-appointed judges.

Sure Ong, WE'RE the ones who refuse to deal with reality.

Have another spliff mate.

[CoccoBill]

Occam's razor:

1) Wide conspiracy covering multiple states, officials, politicians and media, to carefully give the presidency to Biden but still re-elect some key republican senators (I suppose that was the payment for their silence).
2) Trump is a sore loser and some of the republicans that rode on his popularity are still pandering to him to not piss off his followers.

Pretty clear to me which seems more likely.

[Poopadoop]

Pretty clear to me which seems more likely.

That's because you're using conventional reasoning, not spliff-fuelled Onglogic.

Using Onglogic, as soon as anyone who loses an election says there was a conspiracy to steal an election, it should be taken seriously. And when it is taken seriously and shown to be false, that's possibly further evidence of a conspiracy.

Also, if you believe in a conspiracy theory you are morally justified in acting on your paranoid delusions, even to the point of violence. Otherwise the conspirators will always get away with it. Better to kill some innocent people than risk letting anyone who has a zero in a million chance of being guilty get away with it.

[OngBonga]

I stopped watching that link of cocco's almost immediately. Literally the first thing they do is point to the death toll as evidence it was "violent". Of course, the cops killed 3 of the 5, and one of the protester's kills was apparently a Darwin award. With the information I'm currently aware of, the protesters killed one cop. One. That's one too many, of course, but that it not a fair reflection of the "mob". It was clear from the live footage I was watching that the protesters did not want to fight the cops. It seemed to me that the protesters thought the cops should be on their side. I heard words like "traitors" being shouted. It was definitely tense, but it was restrained. It wasn't an all out riot like what we saw in 2020, it wasn't the same level of unrest I find it staggering that people can't admit that.

[OngBonga]

Where else would you expect to hear from it? The Russian state media?

We're getting pretty sidetracked with this, but when Western agencies are reporting about Russia, then you can certainly take it with a huge pinch of salt. We're deep into geopolitics here, anything to keep Russia looking like the bad guys.

It's amusing you use the term "state media" though. Who do you think controls western media?

[CoccoBill]

It's amusing you use the term "state media" though. Who do you think controls western media?

The corporations that run them. OTOH in Russia the state owns fully or partially every single national TV station.

You also didn't answer my question.

[Poopadoop]

anything to keep Russia looking like the bad guys.

Another conspiracy unearthed through careful investigation no doubt.