*** The Official MAGAposting thread ***

[Poopadoop]

I'm not really up on my History of the US Congress, but I'm fairly sure none of those people were supporting an ex-POTUS who was fomenting revolt, and had absolutely no evidence for what they were claiming.

[Mr.Banana]

I'm not really up on my History of the US Congress,

How convenient

but I'm fairly sure none of those people were supporting an ex-POTUS

You are correct. In 2000 it was an ex vice-potus, in 2004 it was a sitting senator, in 2016 it was an ex-FLOTUS.

Thank you for that clarification.

who was fomenting revolt,

The word he used was "cheer". and the remedy that the 140+ congresspeople asked for was an "audit".

and had absolutely no evidence for what they were claiming.

Why do you need evidence to ask questions? Or do an audit? Why does it have to be an open and shut case before we even start the inquiry? What kind of fucked up standard is that?