|  | 
			
			
			
					
					
			
				
					
						
	No. there's no difference.  YOU seem to think that YOU get to decide what is and isn't offensive.
		
			
			
				
					  Originally Posted by CoccoBill   Sure, I'm a private business, I can do whatever I want within law. There's (to my knowledge) nothing in the law there that makes it illegal to refuse making offensive paintings.
 The difference is that in the wedding cake scenario the business is refusing service based on who or what the customers are, and in your scenario based on what the customer is asking.
 
 You're saying its ok to refuse making "offensive paintings".  But not ok to refuse to make "offensive cakes".
 
 To make that claim, you have to arbitrarily decide, yourself, along your chosen ideological lines, that a gay wedding isn't offensive, but humiliating muhammed is offensive.
 
 That's a matter of ideological opinion that you want to spin into law.  That's exactly the kind of thing the constitution was meant to protect against.
 |