*** The Official MAGAposting thread ***

[Mr.Banana]

I made no claim, I said what I had read. Do you see the difference?

No actually. What you said was abundantly clear. The only reason you brought up what you read was to suggest that Russian government agents were present at the Capitol demonstrations and the implication is that their purposes were not beneficial to the united states. You weren't suggesting that the Russian secretary of cheese just happened to be strolling by, were you?

Whether you made a claim or just implied one is really not a meaningful distinction in the context of this conversation.

Like what exactly are you accusing me of, what do you think I'm doing?

I think you know exactly what you implied/suggested/claimed/said when you brought up "russian operatives". And I think you're purposefully trying to nitpick any response for the slightest incongruent syllable so you can fuel a ridiculous argument about nothing. I just don't understand 'why' you're doing it.

I don't know if there were Russians involved, and if there were I don't know who they were or what they were doing. All of that's irrelevant,

HUH???

when the point was just to demonstrate there were all kinds of people.

Ooooh, you just brought up Russians to illustrate ethnic diversity? I get it now.

You seemed to have no idea how data gets classified

Except I worked for three years at a job where I handled classified data every single day. I know what kind of shit gets classified. I know how it gets classified. I already told you this. But you thought your five second google search result would change my mind huh?

Since you seem to be under the impression that people classify stuff on a whim,

They do

How do you know that what she did warranted a charge?

This has to be a troll!

Why wasn't Ivanka charged for essentially the exact same thing?

Cuz flexibility!!!

[MadMojoMonkey]

No actually. What you said was abundantly clear. The only reason you brought up what you read was to suggest that Russian government agents were present at the Capitol demonstrations and the implication is that their purposes were not beneficial to the united states. You weren't suggesting that the Russian secretary of cheese just happened to be strolling by, were you?

Whether you made a claim or just implied one is really not a meaningful distinction in the context of this conversation.


I think you know exactly what you implied/suggested/claimed/said when you brought up "russian operatives". And I think you're purposefully trying to nitpick any response for the slightest incongruent syllable so you can fuel a ridiculous argument about nothing. I just don't understand 'why' you're doing it.

More of the same.

Stop telling people what they mean. This is disrespectful.

You're free to be confused by other people's motives. You're free to speculate what their motives may be. You're free to ask them their motives. You're free to question whether those people are being genuine with you. You are not free to tell them their motives.

[Mr.Banana]

Wut? i get called out for bad faith, and manipulation, and "ad arjkeafji banaadasja" al the time.

You are not free to tell them their motives.

if that's a forum rule, fine. I'll abide.

But if it's a special rule for me, just ban me.