The onus is on you to convince us of your theory - a theory you claimed is unlikely, mind.

How many cogent arguments do you want? There have been a few.
Comments have been made that throw shade on your theory and you ignore them. That doesn't make them go away.


There's no way I'm buying the idea that the security was that bad that day by accident.
If you exclude reason and evidence from your understanding, that's fine, but it's not convincing anyone else, here.