*** Official Politics Shitposting Thread ***

[oskar]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racial...f_Donald_Trump

This is never going to get resolved, because you think that black people are inferior ""culturally"" but you don't think you're a white supremacist. So Trump can say immigrants are "not people... animals" - and yes, I know the context, and if you paid attention you'd see that he's talking about immigrants. This is not an isolated incident. See above.

... The double-think involved in believing it's ok to permanently separate parents from their children after they've asked for asylum at a port of entry, but at the same time losing your shit over Obama referring to people who worship on easter "easter worshippers" instead of listing all the denominations that celebrate easter in some form (#5 will shock you)

Also eversince yesterday - the way you talked about the impossibility of getting over walls, I now think of you as a literal bowling ball with ant legs. I am seriously out of wits how you're both: able to form sentences and spell correctly, but at the same time not understand basic ladder/wall interaction.

[TheSpoonald]

This is never going to get resolved, because you think that black people are inferior ""culturally"" but you don't think you're a white supremacist

WHOA! Careful son. I never said anything like that. I just read data.

So Trump can say immigrants are "not people... animals" - and yes, I know the context,

Apparently you don't.

... The double-think involved in believing it's ok to permanently separate parents from their children after they've asked for asylum at a port of entry, but at the same time losing your shit over Obama referring to people who worship on easter "easter worshippers" instead of listing all the denominations that celebrate easter in some form (#5 will shock you)

You've CNN'd yourself here. Calm down and talk about one thing at a time, ok? The family separation shit is another fake news hoax. And I don't have a problem with Obama saying "easter worshipers". I am suspicious of an obviously coordinated communications campaign that seeks to avoid using certain language. I ask myself "why don't they want to say the c-word?"

Also eversince yesterday - the way you talked about the impossibility of getting over walls, I now think of you as a literal bowling ball with ant legs. I am seriously out of wits how you're both: able to form sentences and spell correctly, but at the same time not understand basic ladder/wall interaction.

I don't see what's so hard to understand. Climbing over a wall with a ladder takes a lot more time, energy, and risk than simply walking through open land. That obstacle drastically increases the chances of apprehension. What are you missing?

And with regards to the 30 foot prototypes for a new border wall, I also don't understand your confusion. People who very much understand wall/ladder interaction tried for 3 weeks to get over the wall, and they could not do so. That's not the ranting misunderstanding of a bowling ball with ant legs. That's the documented result of a weeks long US military exercise.

And just for your own understanding of wall/ladder interaction. If you climb to the top of a wall, you have to get down the other side. IF the wall is 30 feet tall, you can't jump. You can't climb down, the wall has a sheer face that prevents it. The bars start lower down. You'll die if you jump. So you will have to perch yourself on top of the wall, lift the ladder over, and use it to climb down the other side. But the wall is built with apparatus at the top that prevents you from safely perching yourself at the top.

Again, people highly trained in wall/ladder interaction couldn't do it. So what makes you think it's so easy?

[Poopadoop]

blah blah blah

You're already admitted there's more cost effective ways to police the border than the Wall. Your main remaining reason for building it are so Trump can fulfill his promise, while simultaneously not fullfilling his promise about Mexico paying for it.

Your other reason is that a Wall is more effective than no Wall. That's pretty advanced thinking there, and I congratulate you for it. However, a robot army armed with lasers would be even more effective, so why not do that AND the Wall if you really want to waste the taxpayer's money?

[TheSpoonald]

You're already admitted there's more cost effective ways to police the border than the Wall. Your main remaining reason for building it are so Trump can fulfill his promise, while simultaneously not fullfilling his promise about Mexico paying for it.

Dude, we've been over this many times. A wall is permanent, those other "more cost effective ways" are not.