poop, you're looking at the judgement instead of the circumstance, and drawing conclusions from that. This means you're in a position of ignorance.

The British legal system is not as perfect as you like to think. This is the same legal system still holding Julian Assange in prison, and the same legal system that prosecutes plebs like you and I for covid breaches while letting Boris off the hook. You know our system is flawed, yet here you are cheerleading the judgement of a court that threw a man in prison for journalism.

And for no reason other than an attempt to discredit the guy who I trust the most in media. It's personal to you. It's weak as fuck.

If you're not interested in this case, fine. I don't blame you, you have no interest in the guy. But don't think you can rely on the integrity of our legal system, because it's lacking. Not as much as some places, but we do not treat people equally.

I can demonstrate this because I read this guy's blog, and nothing, literally nothing that he has said has ever led to me being able to identify any of the women who made complaints (disproven complaints) about Alex Salmond. The BBC, on the other hand, did publish an article that had me think "so that's one of them". Did that journalist get thrown in prison for contempt? Did he fuckity fuck.