|
 Originally Posted by OngBonga
btw, actually reading his blog is relevant, because the accusation was the he used "jigsaw identification" to identify the accusers. Funny how those who read his blog have no idea who the accusers are.
But he was charged and found guilty of it. The court of appeals upheld his conviction. So either a) they know something you don't; or b) they're all toadies of the establishment. With all due respect to your investigative chops, I'm going with a) above.
 Originally Posted by OngBonga
It's incredible how these accusers can basically be proven in court to have been lying,
Finding someone not guilty of what you accused them of != proving you to be a liar.
 Originally Posted by OngBonga
yet still get the protection of the state. And it's incredible how someone who failed to identify these people goes to prison while "respectable" journalists don't. I'm not aware of a single person who was even able to identify what constituted the "jigsaw identification" he was accused of, let alone who the accuser(s) are. Literally the only thing I know is that at least one of the accusers is a member of the SNP.
If they're found to be lying in court, they should face perjury charges. Then they can and will be exposed. Until then their anonymity has to be respected. Again, it's not about what you think about the case. The law is the law.
Damn, the more I learn about this guy the more of an attention-seeking crank he seems to be.
Seems he got thrown out of the SNP for trying to be in the SNP and run for another party at the same time.
An insider said Murray would no longer have met the criteria for being an SNP member in March when he said he was a Holyrood election candidate for a rival pro-independence party.
|