Maybe you should.

here's some things I dug up in 10 minutes that dispute what you just said.


The first witness was "Woman H", who gave an account of how Salmond allegedly tried to rape her in Bute House after a private dinner in June 2014.[10][11] She had not mentioned this incident when she first talked to police in 2018. The defence suggested that she fabricated the allegations, which the witness rejected.[10] A second witness present at the dinner in question gave evidence stating that "Woman H" was not even present at Bute House on the night in question.
Sounds like 'he said, she said' to me. One person said she wasn't there. She said she was. There's no mention of an entire crowd of people being interviewed.

Another report:

Jurors were shown a recording of a police Skype interview of a guest who had been there on the night in question. When asked who had been at the dinner, he said there were four people – himself, Salmond, a woman involved in Scottish business, and Woman H, he thought. Salmond’s defence argued Woman H had never been at the meal.

The defence called the Scottish businesswoman as a witness.

She told the court she was friends with Woman H but had no “recollection” of her being there.

And yeah, this guy was no saint from the sounds of it.

Salmond claimed the second complainer had a “legitimate grievance” but there was never any intention to take things further than a “sleepy cuddle”
What does that mean exactly? He perved on her while she was asleep?