|
|
 Originally Posted by boost
 Originally Posted by Lukie
 Originally Posted by GatorJH
 Originally Posted by Jack Sawyer
that hand makes so much more sense to me now than it did 3 months ago.
It still doesn't make any sense to me. Then again, I just saw it for the first time and don't really follow the TV poker scene.
Given action and position, Antonius should never have a hand he can c/c a UTG raiser with 3x, but he knows Laak knows this and all that implies. Still, I'd tentatively say it still looks like a really weak play given his equity vs Laak's range, but it sounds like there are some other dynamics at work here that I'm not aware of.
undeniably sick meta game? I mean, seriously, how often are you going to see that entire table be awe struck by a poker hand?
Yeah, I know what you're saying.
One thing I've noticed about Antonius from everything I've seen of him (and no this isn't going to be another homo remark like everybody else), is he always remains remarkably composed, never gives off any tells (that I can pick up on, at least), and is very deliberate in all his actions. Like, I don't even think it's possible to get a read on the guy.
|