|
|
 Originally Posted by OngBonga
I'm not gonna argue with this. The argument is the definition of "rape". There is a distinct difference between an aggressive rapist who forces someone to have sex, and an overage person having sexual relations with a willing, albeit underage, person. To call both "rape" makes no distiction between one and the other, where there should be a distinction.
Rape is penetration without consent. Someone underage is not able to consent. Therefore, sex with an underage person is rape. This is not up for debate.
I'll give you another good example of a similar concept at work. A chick you know is drunk. You finger her vagina. There's penetration, and there is no consent because someone drunk cannot legally consent. Therefore it's rape. Do you disagree with this? Then you're saying that the Steubenville High School rape case that caused a big uproar not all that long ago was bullshit.
Related: Why don't we have a Dumb Fucking Whore Registry?
Also related: Steubenville Rape Convict Back on High School Football Team
|
Reply With Quote