Select Page
Poker Forum
Over 1,292,000 Posts!
Poker ForumFTR Community

A real buzzkill (seriously; the environment dudes)

Results 1 to 75 of 135

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    CoccoBill's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    2,523
    Location
    Finding my game
    Quote Originally Posted by Monty3038 View Post
    Ok... and once you start selling [bottles of water laced with arsenic], how long do you think you will be in business?
    How long will it take for people to notice it has arsenic if it's not tested, the people getting sick or dying from it are not receiving public health care and public news media is not covering the issue? Then when they do get caught and lose business, they just need to change their brand name and continue on. Obviously lacing water with arsenic is a bit dumb, rather use nicotine or opiates or something, much more effective. In a world without regulation and health standards, please explain how the tasteless and odorless nicotine in a bottle of water gets noticed.
  2. #2
    Quote Originally Posted by CoccoBill View Post
    How long will it take for people to notice it has arsenic if it's not tested, the people getting sick or dying from it are not receiving public health care and public news media is not covering the issue? Then when they do get caught and lose business, they just need to change their brand name and continue on. Obviously lacing water with arsenic is a bit dumb, rather use nicotine or opiates or something, much more effective. In a world without regulation and health standards, please explain how the tasteless and odorless nicotine in a bottle of water gets noticed.
    Obviously arsenic is a ridiculous idea, as is the fact that you would just lose business. But both extremes averaged out kind of make the middle ground.
  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by Monty3038 View Post
    Obviously arsenic is a ridiculous idea, as is the fact that you would just lose business. But both extremes averaged out kind of make the middle ground.
    Actually, arsenic is a very normal example. Egregious production practices causing enormous havoc and not costing the businesses much is very common.

    Look at milk pasteurization for example. Raw milk was killing a lot of people, but everybody still wanted it, and it was only until the taxpayer funded government hired some scientists and regulators to fix the problem. Not only did the consumers not punish the businesses for poor dairy production practices, but even today, many consumers are trying to return to that era of lethal milk

    Consumers are not some kind of logical equalizer. We already know for a fact that businesses get away with so many forms of extreme levels of destruction when unhindered by governing bodies represented by and for the public
  4. #4
    CoccoBill's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    2,523
    Location
    Finding my game
    Quote Originally Posted by Monty3038 View Post
    Obviously arsenic is a ridiculous idea, as is the fact that you would just lose business. But both extremes averaged out kind of make the middle ground.
    NRDC: Arsenic in Drinking Water
  5. #5
    Lukie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    10,758
    Location
    Never read any stickies or announcements
    cliffs notes: the government should and does (to an extent) protect us from dangerous contaminants and pollutants and such.

    this isn't particularly groundbreaking stuff here.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •