|
|
 Originally Posted by PokerMuzz
Originally Posted by thizzSantaCruz
The officer says he caught me going 75 in a 55, in reality I was going about 90 when I saw him so I knew he did not have me on radar.
If he has no radar how can he prove beyond all reasonable doubt that you did actually commit an offence? Judge, he looked like he was going fast...
If you appealed this, he has no actual evidence and it would be quashed 100%. No radar, or video for a speeding offence = no crime
Chardrian, correct me if Im wrong, but in this sort of case it doesnt have to be proven beyond reasonable doubt. Im hungover right now so Im not going to try to use the correct wording, but the burden of proof in a case like this is much lower than in a criminal case.
|
Reply With Quote