Quote Originally Posted by boost
meh, youre both making horrible arguments imo. Like its been said before the arguments a cyclical. Rilla your last post is completely self dependent, you cant define a word by using the word in the definition.

Pocketfours argument is a bit stronger since it doesnt rely on some sort of faith in the unknown as rilla seems to be doing. Still both sides remain inadequately supported and therefore dont hold their water.
Well, half of arguing for me is actually proving to myself that I'm right. Mine has faith in the unknown, pocketfours' has faith in the known. That's why it's very cyclical, as I said earlier in the thread. But I enjoy these kind of arguments because it's like a sport to me.

I'd be interested to see if me and pocketfours were locked in a room never to leave until both of us were completely convinced we either have free will or not, if we would ever leave the room. And if we didn't, what were the limiting factors?