I just dont understand. How can there be laws to predict the transfer of ideas? The transferring of an idea is done most commonly by sentences and not all sentences are de-constructed in your mind the same way. The deeper structure of anything I'm trying to say is almost never precisely transfered. It's like compressing a file, transferring it to you and having you decompress it with some losed elements and some replaced elements. And sometimes, not even accurately.

When I say, "My cat ate some rice today." Your mind can make the presuppositions that there is a cat, there was some rice and that it was being eaten by the cat. But that will not create in your mind the same stimulus that it creates in mine. You might only think of rice you've specifically eaten and I may think of only rice which I used to make bean-bags.

So if there are laws of all particle interactions in the universe, that doesn't matter. Because the flow of ideas is not followed by any law. Ideas are formed based on what has happened before, what is happening now and what may happen in the future. Particle flow doesn't consider what may happen, does it? Even though a rock can sense gravity or an airflow can sense an approaching airfoil, they sense that based on what is happening currently. A brain can act on what it thinks is going to happen, what has happened and what is happening. Thoughts aren't trapped to one destiny. They can cycle around in your head for a while until you deem them decent enough to throw back out into the world. There has to be some element which decides when an idea is worth saying. And an element which can decide is an element of free will.

In that sense, it should be almost impossible to develop laws for the meta-processes of our brains without incorporating some decision making element.