Quote Originally Posted by Lukie
here's an idea, if you're going to link to a 20 page snoozefest you give us some cliff notes as well
ehh good point

Cliffs:
--The title of the article is stupid
--More numbers of men at top levels of science and industry are not due to differences in ability but differences in motivation
--There are more men at the top and more men at the bottom in terms of creativity, intelligence, men go to extremes while women are more moderate
--We are descended from twice as many women as men
--Women do not need to take risks to reproduce, the women who passed on their genes were those who played it safe and established strong personal relationships
--Men do need to take risks to reproduce, the men who passed on their genes were those who took high risk-high reward gambles, succeeded, and built wide networks of shallower relationships
--Out of these networks arose the progress of civilization, in the form of universities, corporations, government; this is the source of male dominance, rather than a patriarchal conspiracy, men took the risks necessary to found these institutions and so control them
--Bitches don't know about my dick