OK...this thread is derailing quickly. I'll guess I'll get it back on track...

That pie chart of "black on white" vs. "white on black" crimes is retarded. There are SO many factors that result in these crimes that the pie chart cannot encompass. You cannot simply say "blacks are more aggressive towards whites; this is inexcusable." What I DO find inexcusable is the fact that these pie charts are being created without all things being created equal. We should all agree that there is a difference in education, poverty, etc. between whites, blacks, Hispanics, etc. Obviously there are going to be more crimes committed by blacks against whites. One reason (which was already pointed out) is the simple arithmatic of it. Another (again pointed out) was that there is no reason for whites (basically, those with the wealth in most countries) to look to rob/mug blacks (usually, those with little/no wealth). You rarely hear of a well-to-do black man robbing or stealing from a white person. So what's the variant in the black vs. white crimes (Hint: it isn't the color of their skin)?

Obviously, with this brought across, we must look into WHAT factors come into play when we see that non-whites are more likely to be at or under the poverty level than whites (and no, it's not because they're just lazy). This can spawn a 10-page essay...