Varience at bad live games.

[Numbr2intheWorld]

Lets say you are at a really passive, bad live game (at a casino or a home game). You are a very good player playing semi LAGG and can read these players very well. AKA you absolutely own.

What is your varience in these games? Would you win practically everytime?

[mcatdog]

Of course not. You're never going to be playing more than about 300 hands in a session and any player can easily lose a bundle over such a small number of hands. If you get sucked out on once or twice in a big pot and none of your drawing hands get there, you can easily lose a few buy-ins.

[DaNutsInYoEye]

Of course not. You're never going to be playing more than about 300 hands in a session and any player can easily lose a bundle over such a small number of hands. If you get sucked out on once or twice in a big pot and none of your drawing hands get there, you can easily lose a few buy-ins.

Actually you really should. Assuming you mean the average live $1/2 NL game, then a good NL player should be booking winning sessions 80%+ of the time.

[Numbr2intheWorld]

yes i mean the avg live 1/2 game or your shitty homegame.

[IowaSkinsFan]

I think the variance can be big in a given session because of such donky play, but yeah I agree with DaNuts you can win like 80% of the time.

[redgrape]

Hello

[swiggidy]

Hello

hahahaha