hey wufwugy do some research on sarcasm...it may help you with my response to the aliens theory...
i mean honestly i spelled the word proof with three f's


and you can't use the 'bigfoot would be easy to find based on anecdotal sightings' explanation immediately after you trump 'laymen and their statistically unreliable anecdotes and then go on to make your point #4 - anecdotes mean nothing...
so i guess look up 'irony' or 'contradiction' for your own sake while you are searching for 'sarcasm'...
plus they just found a new big ape species like 5 years ago in congo
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/3730574.stm


95% of the ocean remains unexplored (fact). i do not believe that the lochness monster exists (loch ness is in fact a loch, not an ocean). i just wanted to point out that there is a lot left to discover about the deep blue...

i'm ok with your avid support of scientific practice and knowledge. i'm confused by your claim that phenomena like ghosts can not exist because they are not scientifically proven and "Our understanding is that science is the only method of gathering knowledge in existence" yet you refrain from considering your own previous statement about the inherent limits of science, that "science is largely about making predictions then using current understanding to discover those predictions." i guess we are both agreeing that if there is no current understanding or practical means in which to discover a prediction, then that prediction will remain untestable within the limits of the scientific method...yea?
and on science and ghosts...the law of conservation of energy tells us that energy can not be created nor destroyed but only change in form.


k. happy tuesday. wufwugy you are cool and i like you so lets not be interwebs enemies. i'm going to get drunk